Free
Message: techwiz/doni/silver
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View

If I understand the USPTO document correctly, it's in reference to 774 only. Why no comments re: 737? Is it because 737 is an add on patent and if 774 is upheld then 737 is as well, or do we needed to make another trip for 737?

There were separate office actions is the reason for my question.

Not familiar with the procedures involved.

TIA

4 Recommendations
737 USPTO Control Number

techwiz
Dec 10, 2011 10:37PM
Icon president Re: 737 USPTO Control Number
1
DISCHINO
Dec 11, 2011 06:03AM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
3
gernb1
Dec 11, 2011 06:27AM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
4
gernb1
Dec 11, 2011 07:03AM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
4
downnout
Dec 11, 2011 10:39AM
Icon president Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
8
DISCHINO
Dec 11, 2011 11:37AM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
3
gernb1
Dec 11, 2011 11:44AM
Icon president Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
2
DISCHINO
Dec 11, 2011 12:11PM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
1
gernb1
Dec 11, 2011 12:15PM
Icon president Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
5
DISCHINO
Dec 11, 2011 12:23PM
Icon president Effect of surviving a patent re- examination
16
sman998
Dec 11, 2011 02:27PM
Icon president Re: Effect of surviving a patent re- examination/sman998
6
Minister
Dec 11, 2011 05:00PM
Re:"PHASE CHANGE"
3
geltaforce
Dec 11, 2011 06:51PM
Re: 737 USPTO Control Number check Nov. 18 non Final
3
downnout
Dec 12, 2011 09:26PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply