Spec , Thank you for your well thought post . Even we base our thinking re Woody

inconclusive testimony , in my view thats part of extrinsic evidence. As you know

the majority reversal of claim constructon relied on intrinsic evidence , prosecution

history , specification and examiner interview. Extrinsic testimony does not have

that much influence on final claim construction outcome. Unfortunately the claim

is not clearly pointing to DSP ,Microprocessor and etc using RAM . However Woody

in his direct and cross exam was saying this is common knowledge and ordinary people

known about this .