Pusher you said:

IMO, Samsung settled for a one-time licensing fee and released "certain" Samsung patents to E-dig for future product development (to be marketed by Samsung, not E-digital). Only thing I see different is the releasing of a "very few" (probably only two) patent licenses by Samsung to avoid paying out "real money" ($100M)!!!

pusher

Samsung settlement is confidential! What's different except the cross-licensing agreement is limited to "certain" patents instead of an open-ended deal. It's just legal "wrangling" to avoid a large cash pay-out to a "nobody" with a good lawyer!

pusher

Why don't you tell us (again) how you really feel? The truth is nobody here knows what DM's strategy is, for good reason. Over a year ago it was mentioned that we were going after "low hanging fruit" first. The low hanging fruit "could" last for years or it could have been over with the first round.

You made the comment "It's just legal "wrangling to avoid a large cash pay-out to a "nobody" with a good lawyer!" You might want to listen to your own opinion, if we have such a good lawyer (who's interest is making as much money as possible) why do you doubt their actions?

In the mean time we are accumulating money, paying of debts, acquiring cross licensing and winning every suit filed to date. eDig is in it's best shape ever...this really sucks! :)

Coyote