Free
Message: Re: Samsung license wording. DIS....Seaq
2
Oct 25, 2009 10:43AM
1
Oct 25, 2009 11:02AM
1
Oct 25, 2009 12:20PM
3
Oct 25, 2009 12:27PM
1
Oct 25, 2009 12:29PM
1
Oct 25, 2009 01:02PM

"It is the word 'also' that has had me scratching my head too. Maybe the one-time licensing fee is to cover previous infringement."

That's my point and why it made me curious.

a) Samsung obtained a license, Flash-R etc.

b) EDIG obtained certain Samsung patents.

c) Samsung ALSO paid a 1 time fee.

The other 6 just say cross license agreement and 1 time fee.

Again, this is just discussion, and I assume EDIG's general counsel has to read and approve each PR, or maybe DM in the case of the 7 settlements (?) but Samsung is definately different.

I'll leave it at that.

13
AGORACOM
Oct 27, 2009 11:57AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply