Free
Message: Re: Doni
5
May 22, 2009 11:00AM

May 22, 2009 11:05AM
6
May 22, 2009 11:28AM
7
May 22, 2009 02:23PM
2
May 22, 2009 05:34PM
13
May 22, 2009 06:23PM
1
May 22, 2009 06:33PM
1
May 22, 2009 06:40PM
1
May 23, 2009 08:08AM
2
May 24, 2009 06:25AM

May 24, 2009 06:59AM
3
May 24, 2009 07:15AM
5
May 24, 2009 08:11AM
3
May 24, 2009 08:35AM
3
May 24, 2009 08:59AM
2
May 24, 2009 10:24AM
1
May 25, 2009 08:51AM
1
May 25, 2009 09:01AM

May 25, 2009 09:34AM

May 25, 2009 09:43AM
3
May 25, 2009 09:57AM
3
May 25, 2009 10:21AM
1
May 25, 2009 10:24AM
3
May 25, 2009 10:46AM
4
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:08AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:16AM
1
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:24AM

May 25, 2009 11:29AM
2
May 25, 2009 11:32AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:35AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:37AM
2
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:56AM

Re: Doni

in response to by
posted on May 25, 2009 12:07PM

I have no idea if it can be sited as a general presidence.

They were noted as stipulations in the file.....three to be exact. Would something of this nature be normally noted as stipulations?

Stipulations are normally noted as agreeable terms......what would a judge use normally when ruling "with prejudice"? Would it sound so agreeable?

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply