Free
Message: Re: Doni
5
May 22, 2009 11:00AM

May 22, 2009 11:05AM
6
May 22, 2009 11:28AM
7
May 22, 2009 02:23PM
2
May 22, 2009 05:34PM
13
May 22, 2009 06:23PM
1
May 22, 2009 06:33PM
1
May 22, 2009 06:40PM
1
May 23, 2009 08:08AM
2
May 24, 2009 06:25AM

May 24, 2009 06:59AM
3
May 24, 2009 07:15AM
5
May 24, 2009 08:11AM
3
May 24, 2009 08:35AM
3
May 24, 2009 08:59AM
2
May 24, 2009 10:24AM
1
May 25, 2009 08:51AM
1
May 25, 2009 09:01AM

May 25, 2009 09:34AM

May 25, 2009 09:43AM
3
May 25, 2009 09:57AM

Re: Doni

in response to by
posted on May 25, 2009 10:21AM

"what is the reason for the long list referencing e.Digitals patents?"

New applications....MSFT is in there

IMO, it's going to be tough to circumvent the ideas of e.Digital with regard to data structure/support and portability. This is the heart that allows all.

445/108 being pulled "with prejudice" from the Samsung case, has to mean something.

I keep asking myself, why? There is something up with agreeing to it, because we did not have to give up our rights to pursue them in the future.

They're up to something, and you can bet the rest of the industry is watching for the reasons of those two simple words.

doni

1
May 25, 2009 10:24AM
3
May 25, 2009 10:46AM
4
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:08AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:16AM
1
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:24AM

May 25, 2009 11:29AM
2
May 25, 2009 11:32AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:35AM
1
May 25, 2009 11:37AM
2
Moo
May 25, 2009 11:56AM
1
May 25, 2009 12:07PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply