Free
Message: Re: PACER Samsung
12
Mar 06, 2009 12:49PM
1
Mar 06, 2009 12:57PM
1
Mar 06, 2009 01:52PM
3
Mar 06, 2009 02:23PM
2
Mar 06, 2009 03:41PM
3
Mar 06, 2009 04:10PM
7
Mar 06, 2009 08:25PM

Mar 06, 2009 10:40PM
8
Mar 06, 2009 11:05PM
8
Mar 07, 2009 01:22AM
7
Mar 07, 2009 03:38AM
2
Mar 07, 2009 03:41AM
5
Mar 07, 2009 04:48AM
3
Mar 07, 2009 05:07AM

Mar 07, 2009 06:06AM
2
Mar 07, 2009 06:25AM
5
Mar 07, 2009 06:34AM
5
Mar 07, 2009 06:43AM
2
Mar 07, 2009 07:36AM
2
Mar 07, 2009 07:49AM
2
Mar 07, 2009 08:18AM
5
Mar 07, 2009 08:55AM
3
Mar 07, 2009 09:08AM

Mar 07, 2009 04:14PM

Mar 08, 2009 08:47AM
1
Mar 08, 2009 09:19AM

Mar 08, 2009 09:22AM

"I was hoping for a Samsung settlement without what appears to be an obvious roadblock but I'm not sure I'd view this as a bad thing. The fact that their lawyers have produced, what'd you say silver, 900 pages of documents, lends me to believe the monitary licensing demand was very significant. The lawyers expense to Samsung to produce that kind of effort must be hugh. So if there is a silver lining I'd say that the outcome of positive settlement is that the fee's are hugh. The down side is that a settlement may have to wait one or two years. I'm not sure if a new markman hearing date get set or they piggy back on to the existing Vivitar date that is already scheduled for May 2010."

To me it's a good thing to now put the screws on.....collectively they got at lest 10 mill from the first six....the question is, is it enough to push Samsung around...keeping in mind that DM is working at cost...?

Samsungs Markman Hearing is scheduled for Feb 2010.

My vote, lets go for broke on this baby

I'm not going to worry about what I might lose.

Shake the dice and throw.

doni

9
Mar 08, 2009 06:14PM
1
Mar 08, 2009 06:30PM

Mar 08, 2009 07:09PM

Mar 08, 2009 07:19PM
4
Mar 08, 2009 07:44PM
5
Mar 08, 2009 08:33PM
6
Mar 09, 2009 04:01AM
1
Mar 09, 2009 09:35AM

Mar 09, 2009 09:40AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply