I think you're confusing the word "objective" with "positive." LL was more "positive" a few years ago, but his objectivity was not a lot different then than it is now. He's probably a little more objective now, I think that repetitive "2005" projection may have forced his hand a little bit. But hey, at one time 2005 was the distant future and it seemed reasonable to suggest edig could come through for us by that year. And suggest and suggest and suggest.

Time is money ... and we've spent a heck of a lot of it waiting on edig.

Wolfy