jefother....

If we are to believe what RP states(even the recent Casio monetary email considerations) then, some where, you have to give thought to the tier 1 / tier 2 issue. Because at this point, with regard to one time fees combined with X-licensing of the entire portfolio, makes no sense to me, very short gains.

Do I believe what RP has stated at the SHM? I'm having a tough time with this issue to say the least.

Do you believe what RP has stated with regard to tier 1 / tier 2? If so, explain how you feel it comes into play at two different levels of a settlement?

Now I'm reviewing the tax carry forward issue, with out any input form anyone, and that is not looking good at all.

Between the both issues, I'm getting a nasty taste.

doni