Free
Message: Re: The OS that uses the battery power
5
Jan 16, 2008 12:13PM
3
Jan 16, 2008 12:18PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 12:31PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 12:41PM
3
Jan 16, 2008 12:45PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 01:43PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 01:53PM

Jan 16, 2008 02:09PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 02:27PM
2
Jan 16, 2008 02:34PM
2
Jan 16, 2008 02:34PM
4
Jan 16, 2008 02:52PM
3
Jan 16, 2008 03:04PM
2
Jan 16, 2008 03:18PM

Jan 16, 2008 03:19PM

Jan 16, 2008 03:21PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 03:28PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 03:33PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 03:52PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 04:38PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 05:18PM
2
Jan 16, 2008 07:13PM
1
Jan 16, 2008 08:43PM

Jan 17, 2008 05:56AM
1
Jan 17, 2008 06:33AM
2
Jan 17, 2008 07:10AM

Jan 17, 2008 07:25AM
2
Jan 17, 2008 12:05PM
2
Jan 17, 2008 03:07PM
1
Jan 17, 2008 03:29PM
1
Jan 17, 2008 04:03PM
2
Jan 17, 2008 04:08PM

Note: For the CF(R) FLASHBACK AUDIO(TM) TECHNOLOGY driven. In 1998, the flash matrix was NOR, with limited density. Intel lead this faction.

e.Digitals 34 word phrase, even though utilizing a NOR based component in 1998, favored a NAND environment. Nand density could be and would be achieved, and e.Digitals IP best suited it.

Through their firmware, they treated the NOR environment in the same manner they treated the Nand environment, even though the NOR could be directly executed without the need of any RAM what so ever. Density and write is its achilles heal in competing against the principles of e.Digitals IP.

I followed the NOR vs NAND bullshi* before it was even noted in the media and made my opinions evident from the beginning of where this was all going.

For the above reasons, we were put on the back burner....and during that time frame the Leaders of e.Digital persevered the onsolet of not doing the right things. They did everything right(or best they could) in preserving the IP, while waiting this whole process to relinquish.

Now everything is NAND this NAND that in the media. CF is now produced in a NAND matrix....Intel has gone NAND....and the beat goes on.

doni

7
Jan 18, 2008 05:12AM
1
Jan 18, 2008 05:49AM
4
Jan 18, 2008 08:28AM

Jan 18, 2008 09:56AM
4
Jan 18, 2008 01:29PM
1
Jan 18, 2008 01:46PM
1
Jan 18, 2008 02:07PM
2
Jan 18, 2008 04:28PM
2
Jan 18, 2008 04:31PM
1
Jan 18, 2008 04:39PM
2
Jan 18, 2008 05:47PM
1
Jan 18, 2008 05:54PM

Jan 18, 2008 05:55PM

Jan 18, 2008 05:57PM

Jan 18, 2008 07:00PM

Jan 19, 2008 02:51AM
1
Jan 19, 2008 07:03AM
1
Jan 19, 2008 07:17AM

Jan 19, 2008 07:25AM
3
Jan 19, 2008 07:26AM

Jan 19, 2008 07:52AM
1
Jan 19, 2008 12:19PM
1
Jan 19, 2008 12:23PM
1
Jan 19, 2008 12:45PM

Jan 19, 2008 12:47PM
2
Jan 19, 2008 01:12PM
2
Jan 19, 2008 03:37PM
2
Jan 19, 2008 04:01PM
1
Jan 19, 2008 04:15PM
1
Jan 19, 2008 07:46PM
1
Jan 20, 2008 07:27AM
1
Jan 20, 2008 08:18AM
2
Jan 20, 2008 01:26PM

Jan 20, 2008 01:39PM

Jan 20, 2008 03:05PM

Jan 20, 2008 05:48PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply