Free
Message: Re: DM - Filings...LL...sman9...

Jul 06, 2007 06:46AM

Jul 06, 2007 06:49AM

Jul 06, 2007 07:16AM

Jul 06, 2007 07:33AM

Jul 06, 2007 07:38AM

Jul 06, 2007 03:28PM

Jul 07, 2007 09:26AM

Jul 07, 2007 03:18PM

Jul 08, 2007 09:47AM

Jul 08, 2007 01:16PM

Jul 08, 2007 01:24PM

Jul 08, 2007 03:46PM

Jul 08, 2007 07:26PM

Your comment that follows was the exact rationale for the rise of the EDIG pps to $24+ dollars between CES 2000 and March of 2000, when the Tech. Bubble started deflating.

"If we got lucky and win the case in embedded and removable flash memory in portable devices like cell phones, pda/ pocket pc, portable a/v recorder, digital camera, camcorder our licensing fee could be astronomical ."

Everyone then was comparing EDIG to Qualcom which was in the upper $100s and had split at least twice. I recall a poster named WTMGUY who had visions of EDIG pps hitting $500 dollars...

Samsung was sharing a booth with EDIG, and had models of CAMERAS and CELL phones which were touted as future of tech gadgets to be developed...

The Tech Bubble burst of 2000 delayed development of the market which you note is about 25 billion now...

A filing by DM of a billion dollar law suit against Samsung will resuscitate EDIG's pps substantially. And, a Markman Hearing favorable to EDIG should have the market responding like early 2000.

Bearing in mind that PTSC is "sharing" its take with others, (the Leckrones), and EDIG will not; and considering that Flash based markets are just starting, there is no reason why EDIG pps should not do better than PTSC's...

GLTA

Gil...


Jul 09, 2007 07:06AM

Jul 09, 2007 07:43AM

Jul 09, 2007 10:07AM

Jul 09, 2007 10:12AM

Jul 09, 2007 10:28AM

Jul 09, 2007 10:33AM

Jul 10, 2007 12:15AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply