I'm not sure what the angle is with this post. Someone bought 2000 shares at market price via RBC, so an anonymous seller got rid of his 1,500 order at 14c, then an eTrade seller sold part of his order (500) at 14c. This dropped the bid to 12c and the ask remains at 14c, 3 orders on the ask and one on the bid.
| # Orders |
Board Lots |
Bid |
Ask |
Board Lots |
# Orders |
| 1 |
32 |
0.120 |
0.140 |
74 |
3 |
| 1 |
74 |
0.110 |
0.145 |
30 |
1 |
| 1 |
20 |
0.090 |
0.150 |
30 |
1 |
| 1 |
80 |
0.060 |
0.155 |
30 |
1 |
| 1 |
20 |
0.050 |
0.160 |
28 |
1 |
| 26 Jan 2009 10:27 AM ET Real-time quote TSX Venture |
This is not unusual for a thinly traded small-cap company! Over the past few days we have opened with the following transactions:
Jan 16 11.55am Blackmont sold to eTrade
Jan 18 10.36am Blackmont sold to RBC
Jan 20 12.18pm CIBC sold to Jones Gable
Jan 21 9.30am CIBC sold to eTrade
Jan 22 9.33am TD sold to TD
I'm not sure that this constitutes a pattern. Now, given our situation we should have more volume.
There's an odd lot 100 transaction just gone through, they're the ones that stand out to me but as you noted procite they don't affect the market SP.
All the best,
Rich
