All very good points rennie69. I think the biggest impediment to moving into the senior TSX is cost. I'm not sure how they figure the costs on each of the exchanges, but the senior is quite a bit more ( from what I have been told).

Almost all the junior ( at least too many) companies on the junior TSX are below the standards set ( lack of cash ) to remain on there. But, it is a real problem to kick them off as well. Such is the bind we find ourselves in. It isn't that Zenyatta is in this bind ( yet). They have watched their cash flows very well. They deserve a lot more credit from some sources than they get, but that is how jelousy and envy works.

I still favour developing this by Zenyatta and all the signs point to that happening. Staying on the junior is to conserve cash but the other plus is it keeps us under the radar. Some very nice plays are missed because of this. I'm not saying nobody looks, but in Zenyatta's case, if they look they can't see. Some just plain do not want to see. BumbleBee points this out very well.

Another humourous case is going on between C and a very intelligent writer and thinker, Versitileye. Apparently, C is blocking him from posting it elswhere for everyone's benefit. This is hearsay, so do not hang me for this. Perhaps C will threaten me with a law suit if I tell this story, but I am one of the principals, so he can go ahead.

Back when I was a member of TCC ( those were good times) C wrote a peice downplaying ZEN. He did some of his brilliant math and concluded that there was so much overburden above ZEN's graphite, that it would probably be uneconomic. The "wannabe" and him got into a hassle about it. I wrote a post making the case that the overburden was not really waste. These two experts did not see this, and I am no expert. So I ended by asking what someone knowledgeable in mining thought. Versitileye was the one who answered with a very well explained reply. His conclusion was that the overburden was valuable to bild up a wet area to build the infastructure on. He reasoned, if the overburden was not there, the fill for that and the upgrade to the road would have to be purchased.

I am not surprised so many intelligent writers left TCC and C was left with an empty shell. It was others who lost the benefit of some very intelligent and thought provoking writing. TCC was in those days a very good place to be, and well worth the $20 I spent to read those posts.

I hope some of you get to read this before it gets flagged and taken off. It has happened far too often and the one who writes never gets to plead his case. It gets blindly removed. I have no chip on my shoulder towards anyone. I do like to hold people to a level of fairness. What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. How about some fair play?