Mises,

Thanks for challenging me. I've looked through my emails, and found the April 2009 comparison I put to DW, and his reply.

Note that April 2009 was about when Romarco had just began to take off from an uglly low period, very much like Tyhee's is today:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/markets/stocks/chart/?q=R-X

Their key news release was March 19th, 2009:

http://www.romarco.com/news/2009/index.php?&content_id=237

Note that their RESERVE was calculated at 0.514 g/t for 610,000 ounces at that time.

As for my first post on R here at Tyhee hub on agoracom was 23 April 2009:

"here is what a feasability study does for a gold junior headed to production".

I've just now sent DW a follow-on question, so I can clear things up on this important question.

Certainly I should have re-read the old email before commenting. I'll post or paraphrase his reply when I get it.

In any case, my focus here is that as much as R's property is different from Tyhees, R is a good example of what can happen when a company gets past some key benchmarks like Pre Feas, Financing, Permits, Feas etc. Certainly I wish I had put money into R back when it was so cheap, as I expect people will wish they had when Tyhee was (is today) so cheap.

Anyhow, thanks for keeping your sharp eye on thing here!

More to follow shortly.

SKELEG