Did you know?
You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)
My contention is that the statement is truthful in the very areas that this class of investor wants to know about. And that any perceived fault is merely a matter of "mathematical nitpicking" about details that these investors seldom care about - even when they do know about them.
You immediately counter with the innuendo that the statement is misleading investors into making decisions based on faulty information.
Something is getting "missed in the translation" here.
