...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: Re: Why the science doesn't sell.... yet (Koo)
6
Mar 21, 2016 02:01PM
6
BKC
Mar 22, 2016 11:29AM

Mar 22, 2016 06:29PM
8
Mar 22, 2016 07:29PM

,,,,,Hartland,,,,,,,it is my opinion,,,,,,,it is only worth the paper its printed on and possibly well off the mark,,,,,but nothing surprises me in the market,,,,,I think we are in a vulnerable position, especially at this point in time. When HL made their deal the share price was double where we are today. They dont have a crystal ball either nor do they care about the share price. If share price was an issue they certainly have the means to support it but they are not.

I am looking at the business end of the equation,,not the science end. KD and HL I assume are focusing on their specific business situation and assessing both pre and post BoM. I will again assume they would make a judgement call on the business side when timing is best for them. And I dont think any of the major insiders gives a rats derriere about how much a retail investor fairs out on RVX. As you speak of lowering the boom,,,,,,,,KD lowered the boom when RVX was stressed out and he got the IP written into the PP back in 2013. He didnt buy in cuz he feels for us! ,,,or the IP would never have been targeted,,,,,And come mid 2017 I think they will do what is in their interest.

That leaves DM with what options are available to best enhance us in the long run. What are these options??? But all is mum on that front as posters have noted many times here. Dont get me wrong,, I want the very best long term for us,,,,I drank DMs koolaid for years and have invested way too much $$$ in this company. Percetage wise to our individual wealth, we probably all have more at stake than any of these major insiders. Again jmo.

3
Mar 29, 2016 05:34PM
4
Mar 30, 2016 12:08AM
4
Mar 30, 2016 07:19AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply