Just to be clear, you want us to fight against the company, who knows all of what is happening within it, because we do not?

Clearly, with past events, you must have some understanding of the difficulty the company has in providing us with information that may assist others in destroying us....?

I'll use your two examples:

i) firm evidence of significant increases or decreases in near-term earnings prospects;

What would this tell competitors? I suppose if contracts had been signed then "near-term" could be used, but otherwise everything else is out in the future. Furthermore, define "firm", because I bet your definition and Suresh's (and David's) are somewhat different.

j)  potential significant markets for the Corporation’s products and/or technologies, future opportunities and strategic initiatives available to or considered by the Corporation;

Again, why would we want to give this information to competitors? Does Apple tell their shareholders what they are scheming up in the background? Of course not, nor does any electronics company.

I'm afraid that I will not be able to accompany you on that journey for I believe the company is doing what they need to do to protect our IP from the likes of II-VI.