Sulasailor it was stated "...40-nm which should enable POET performance parameters to compete with present state-of-the-art processes"

Which should enable them to compete?

I thought the performances parameters already exceeded state-of-the-art at 200nm. Thats what Taylor said in one of the news releases I believe earlier this year, or near end of last. I figured 100nm would blow anyone else away and then they make a statement now that it should compete. Does anyone have any opinions on this because the first news release mentioned 3-4 nodes ahead of mainstream technology at 40nm. That sounds great but I'm confused about that statement in the second release.

I wish they would provide some metrics at the current 100nm because I was under the impression we were already competing with mainstream at 100nm or even 200nm (certainly in terms of power consumption). The rest of the two releases are excellent.