Bull.

There is plenty of evidence to counter your arguments. For example, you have somehow rearranged time to put the hiring of AC after the meetings with prospective buyers/licensees. The fact is they hired AC to help guide them to the most lucrative outcome for shareholders. The DD report for shopping POET around was completed - at best - one month ago. Yet you have led this board (and presumably yourself) to believe that AC was brought on to lead POET on a different path after failing to find a buyer. The timeline of events does not support this opinion.

On that note, it might be true that everyone is entitled an opinion, but nobody is entitled to maintain an opinion when the real world contradicts it. In my opinion, there are fairies living in my laundry basket.

I'm not even going to address the "bankruptcy card" bullet. It's silly and I won't acknowledge it unless pressed further.

Some of us actually get off our cans and search for info we don't have. You don't get to call it insider info just because you didn't know about it. Just because it wasn't detailed in an NR doesn't make it off limits, it has to be material. For instance, we know LS and (I think) Taylor went to SPIE. How do we know that? Someone shared the info after talking with a director or IR. We also learned that chips are to be delivered by engineers, not UPS. We got that by the same means. It turns out that I do know some of the facts with near certainty.

Again, I can do this all day. Stop claiming that you have been right while everyone else has been proven wrong. That is a demonstrably false statement, and I only need to go back to this mornings post to prove it.