Re: ROF mentioned on BNN today,,,not a positive mention,,,
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 24, 2014 09:43PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
"You notice the dumb SOB never mentioned the imployment in the area!"
More to the point this "person" used a not so subtle attempt to taint the waters by referring to it as something of a social program no doubt expecting general contempt of investors against FN to kick in. This was such a crass and obvious sleight at the ROF. Point is that everything he said had a legitimate angle to it and the usual of course is to leave out all of the pertinent info. from the opposing point of view. Notice he left out the wealth of PM's that alone will likely one day validate the existance of the ROF. He spoke of Cr and Ni. but nothing of the other goodies. This is business politics at it's best. You have to ask yourself, why would he take the time to speak out against a development that he has no real interest in. Why would he be interested in anything Canadian as far as where we spend our tax dollars? He a little worried about something? I wonder how many shares he's looking to pick up. Notice he also slammed Clf as not a real company to be considered....could be he also has some interest there too. One thing I've learned....never listen to the talking heads. They only have one interest....stear the people where their handlers want them to go.....which of course is the opposite to where they are going. This is a clear signal to buy NOT. Notice how NOT held up in today's market.