HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 60 cents - Sum4All
36
Jun 28, 2011 07:55PM
12
Jun 28, 2011 08:17PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 08:19PM
14
Jun 28, 2011 10:27PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 10:50PM
8
Jun 29, 2011 05:37AM
11
Jun 29, 2011 10:37AM
13
Jun 29, 2011 01:10PM
19
Jun 29, 2011 03:02PM
2
Jun 29, 2011 03:45PM
5
Jun 29, 2011 03:55PM
14
Jun 29, 2011 04:20PM
6
Jun 29, 2011 06:54PM

I don't really want to spend the time looking through the drill from eagles nest but I would

imagine that any ore is reltively close in density to the majority of the waste sulphide material (sulphide intrusion) around it, which is probably around double the density of the waste/country rock.


But all of this is besides the point as it is highly unlikely that either the weight of the core or the rods played much any role in the ability to drill. A driller only brings up the entire drill stem if s/he has to change a bit or something jams, and the same length of core is always brought up (I am not to familiar with surface operations but underground it is typically 10') on a wire line inside the hollow drill stem.


I would imagine ground conditions make is way to expensive to continue drilling, it would probably not be impossible it just doesn't make sense to spend the money and time drilling.

2
Jun 29, 2011 09:50PM
11
Jun 29, 2011 11:16PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply