HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 60 cents - Sum4All
36
Jun 28, 2011 07:55PM
12
Jun 28, 2011 08:17PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 08:19PM
14
Jun 28, 2011 10:27PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 10:50PM
8
Jun 29, 2011 05:37AM
11
Jun 29, 2011 10:37AM
13
Jun 29, 2011 01:10PM
19
Jun 29, 2011 03:02PM
2
Jun 29, 2011 03:45PM

"High grade nickel core (5%) is much heavier the lower grade (0.9%) due to the ~100% volume of sulphide minerals present (pentlandite, pyrrhotite and pyrite + pms). All of these minerals are almost twice as heavy as barren rock."

My point was and is that it is not significant enough to mitigate extraction. I was also comparing apples to apples in that we're talking about the difference within the same deposit where one part of the core may have for example, 1.5% at 5m and another might be 4% at 6m. It is all extracted the same way and does not pose an issue for the equipment used.

14
Jun 29, 2011 04:20PM
6
Jun 29, 2011 06:54PM
7
Jun 29, 2011 09:45PM
2
Jun 29, 2011 09:50PM
11
Jun 29, 2011 11:16PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply