Burnie, I agree with what you have actually said.

However, lately we have had posts which are ALL negative, but dressed up in verbiage such that they might be taken for informed comment. If a post is all negative even though seemingly profound, I think their are grounds for questioning the motives of the poster.

We need to have all the facts that are available, but where the disguised agenda is to drive down the price by discouraging longs who are not fully informed, I think we need to call them out. Unfortunately, these do not always fit into the Agoracom format of what constitutes a violation.

My opinion only, of course.

O.F.