HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
4
longstockings
Feb 17, 2009 04:50AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
1
miner71
Feb 17, 2009 05:17AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
16
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 05:28AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
7
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 05:55AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
8
donypee
Feb 17, 2009 06:05AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
5
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 06:06AM

Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg

posted on Feb 17, 2009 06:21AM

miskealp,

If Noront decides to take one more look at Windfall it must be based on a sound risk/reward analysis. A change in the status of Windfall must be made public. A second attempt at Windfall caries many risks for the new board. If they should fail a second attempt I would be calling for their resignation. This would only be fair to Richard.

rosehill

3 Recommendations
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
5
Oldster
Feb 17, 2009 07:30AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply