HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
4
longstockings
Feb 17, 2009 04:50AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
1
miner71
Feb 17, 2009 05:17AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
16
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 05:28AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
7
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 05:55AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom
8
donypee
Feb 17, 2009 06:05AM

Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom

posted on Feb 17, 2009 06:06AM

BertaCurry,

Gold occurrence, unlike chromite, can be very illusive. Your 5 man crew will most likely be moving a lot of dirt before they find gold. By placing Windfall under care and maintenance the company has told us that we don't have 52 gms/ton. After all, who would turn away from a gold mine yielding 52 gms/ton.

rosehill

5 Recommendations
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
3
rosehill
Feb 17, 2009 06:21AM
Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? -obg
5
Oldster
Feb 17, 2009 07:30AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply