HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: news out for mtx
7
Jun 03, 2008 08:34PM

Jun 04, 2008 07:38AM

Jun 04, 2008 07:46AM
20
Jun 04, 2008 07:48AM

Jun 04, 2008 07:48AM
14
Jun 04, 2008 07:48AM
3
Jun 04, 2008 07:50AM

Jun 04, 2008 07:57AM
2
Jun 04, 2008 08:33AM
9
CMP
Jun 04, 2008 08:45AM
6
Jun 04, 2008 08:45AM
1
Jun 04, 2008 09:02AM
3
Jun 04, 2008 09:19AM
1
Jun 04, 2008 11:58AM
14
Jun 04, 2008 04:33PM
5
Jun 04, 2008 09:34PM
5
Jun 04, 2008 09:53PM
2
Jun 04, 2008 10:13PM
9
Jun 04, 2008 10:48PM

I think TA does work, but one reason it does, is because so many investors use it. How much of success with TA is as the result of this reason, I don't know, perhaps very, very little.

However, the sense I often get from those that use it, then explain it, is of a thoroughbred bettor who uses the Racing Form to figure his play, going over the just completed race and explaining why the particular result occurred, using the horse's past performances to demonstrate how clear the event was. Of course, the bettor has usually missed the one key factor that should have clued him into the winner. Like my dad used to say, "if they ran to their past performances, the favorite would always win." No doubt an overstatment, but there is some wisdom in the statement.

I sometimes hear arguments from TA advocates that, boiled down to the essentials, go something like this, "based on this chart, this stock will go up tomorrow, unless it doesn't."

Far from being a harsh critic of TA, I'm for anything that correctly predicts that the NOT sp will go up, and so long as it does go up, I'm happy even if no one predicted it.

3
Jun 05, 2008 05:28AM
4
Jun 05, 2008 06:06AM
4
Jun 05, 2008 06:10AM

Jun 05, 2008 06:16AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply