Re: Good point JD... dony-bentonstocks
in response to
by
posted on
May 27, 2008 02:35PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Good to see that your confusion is gone now Geo. Thanks for all the help today and it just goes to show you. Here Bentonstocks' father was a GEO. You are a GEO in touch with him on a regular basis. I guess Bentonsocks, should not have used those terms.
So now I am enlightened with the fact that "massive" is an adjective. Well gee, thanks a lot.
Tell me why massive is used in that NR in simple english. Does it not say massive sulfides? If it says Massive sulfides what do they mean? Do massive sulfides hold minerals? More specifically do the massive sulfides in this case allow one to believe this is not bad news? Will you give us that?
Massive sulfide is a mineral occurrence. You state it yourself...Don