HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
NOT and DE3 Hit
15
Nickelodian
Mar 20, 2008 12:45PM
Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
27
Polylabel
Mar 20, 2008 01:34PM
Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
2
hgs225
Mar 20, 2008 01:37PM
Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
1
geoprof
Mar 20, 2008 02:04PM
Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
4
Aussie1
Mar 20, 2008 02:40PM
Problem is that reporting visible gold in a core sample could be very misleading. Upon assay it could be anything from grams to ounces per tonne. Doesn't take much gold to be visible. Nickel in massive sulfides seems to be more evenly distributed and a good guess at what it will assay ouit at more likely.
2 Recommendations
Re: NOT and DE3 Hit
1
Dan Martin
Mar 20, 2008 04:32PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply