Down-hole geophysical survey?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

noway

Rank: President [?]

Points: 1609 [?]

Votes: 101 Score: 3.4 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Down-hole geophysical survey?

posted on Feb 23, 2008 05:46AM

Does anyone knows what kind of down-hole geophysical survey they are using on DE-1, just curious because I read that in ground geophysics, the UTEM IV transmitter, and the recent SQUID technology and its integration with standard ground TEM systems, were designed to give better depth of penetration as well as conductance discrimination. I’m not to sure but I think Falconbridge’s Nickel Rim project was discovered by ( UTEM IV) method. The contractor was Lamontagne Geophysics. So what I'm trying to say is that if today's geophysical technology methods can read quite deep & clearer then our chances of finding deeper ore zones must be enormous.