HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Nickel or not?
10
Sep 21, 2007 09:04PM
Icon question OT
1
Sep 22, 2007 02:35PM

Sep 22, 2007 02:45PM
1
Sep 22, 2007 03:06PM

Nickel or not?

posted on Sep 22, 2007 03:36PM

"For the most part, exploration in the region has targeted geophysical anomalies that were associated with volcanogenic massive sulfide mineralization: a geologic environment not conducive to nickel deposits. Likewise, the presence of granodiorite intersected in holes to the north, south and at depth, essentially hosting the mineralization, is atypical of the big nickel deposits or major primitive magma plumes."

If this area is not conducive to nickel then why do we have an assay demonstrating a healthy nickel content? 


Sep 22, 2007 04:22PM
3
Sep 22, 2007 06:10PM
1
Sep 22, 2007 10:05PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply