You wrote ( and I agree):
The ITC's "first" ruling came before the court ruling which was in our favor. In other words the court ruling was after and too late for the ITC's "first" ruling. But here we are with the ITC ( 4-0 ) willing to review it again knowing full well about the "late" information of how the court ruled in our favor.
Did our favorable ruling from the court influence the ITC to review our case again? I have to believe it did.
So why wouldn't they use "late" information once again????