BARCO case on PLL's
posted on
Jun 08, 2013 06:08PM
From the Barco case on PLLs it appears that the PLLs in the accused  infringers microprocessors contain a ring oscillator which generates the  initial clock signal. The PLL itself is timed by an external off chip  reference crystal BUT NOT THE RING OSCILLATOR ITSELF located on chip. I think  this is the confusion the accused infringers are trying to take advantage of.  Microprocessors that infringe on the 336 can have an external off chip crystal  or timing device it just cannot be the initial source for the clocking of the  CPU. The on chip ring oscillator is that source. The ITC judge noted in his  denial of summary judgment did say: 
"the administrative law judge finds  that the portions of Dr. Oklobdjiza's initial report providing a general  description of PLLs raise a material issue as to whether the oscillators in  the PLLs of the Respondants accused products generate a clock signal without a  control signal, external crystal clock or clock generator. (see Oklobdjiza  Rep. at 76-77.)" 
The info below is TPL/PTSC response to the Barco MSJ in  the NDOC case: 
"The Barco Lighting Console Hog iPC contains an Agere  100404226 microprocessor.7 TPL’s Infringement Contentions included an Alliacense  Product Report and Alliacense Teardown Report, with a photograph showing that  the Agere 1004040226 microprocessor is connected to an external crystal. See Oklobdzija Decl., 23. This is evident because the photograph shows the  device Dr. Oklobdzija identified as a crystal is stamped with the name “TXC,” a  company that makes and sells crystals and oscillators, and “30,000,” which  indicates that the crystal oscillates at 30 MHz. Id. In addition, based on the  photograph, the packaging of the TXC device resembles a crystal, and TXC’s  website contains photographs of crystals with identical packaging. Id., 24.  The crystal is an external timing reference for the PLL, and as  discussed previously, a VCO is an indispensable and necessary building block of  the PLL. Id., 25. Because of the VCO’s relationship to parameters, such as  voltage and temperature (among others), the VCO is a variable speed oscillator  by its nature. Id. As with the AMCC chip, a VCO is most commonly implemented  using a ring oscillator. Oklobdzija Decl., 25. Variability of the VCO due to  voltage and other parameters is described in Ian Young’s fundamental paper about  PLLs. Id. The art of PLL and VCO design, including its variability based on  parameters of temperature, voltage, and process, has not changed fundamentally  since Young’s article was published in 1992. Id. It is well known to one  having ordinary skill in the art that the variable-speed VCO, implemented using  a ring oscillator, is the element generating the clocking signal used to time  the CPU."
This was a post by Neverending on another board.