I see your point. Not being an EE all I can do is refer to the Otteson communication again.

"In my admittedly less-than-expert reading of this, the overriding issue seems to be the interpretation of the word "entire" in this context, which Mr. Otteson confirmed. Mr. Otteson further replied that, obviously, he would have preferred that the Judge had accepted our contruction. However, even though the Judge did not do so, Mr. Otteson believes that we have still presented a lot of evidence of infringement and have a strong argument in favor of such, even under the Judge's construction."