tks sedley, here is the wording!

.....My first question to Mr. Otteson referenced the striking of our supplemental expert report, over which I was concerned. Mr. Otteson advised, however, that this report was very short and only intended to clarify a couple of issues, and that he believes there is a great deal of evidence otherwise in the record that adequately supports our position. As a result, Mr. Otteson does not believe that the striking of the supplemental report did any great harm to us. Of course, that doesn't gurantee a ruling in our favor, but it doesn't seem as bad as it appeared on the surface......