No. What he is doing is taking a number given by Leckrone off the top of his head,

You don't think Leckrone knows exactly what the MMP had taken in at the ASM?

declaring it gospel because nobody disputed it on the spot

If it was an inaccurate number it should have been disputed on the spot (as Lamberts has stated prev) because making statements as such at an ASM is the equivalent of puting out a PR

and then he has worked backwards subtracting from there to conclude what "must be coming from all of those unannounced licenses"

All of Lamberts figures have come from Qs, Ks, court docs & a publicly stated total.. I don't see where the problem is..

I think setting artificially high expectations is more about exacerbating a downdraft on the collective disappointment when expectations are not met than it is about "holding management responsible"

So someone can score cheaper shares no doubt.. I believ Lamberts would very much like to see the shareprice go UP