Given all the allegations made on here by the most vociferous proponents of "wrongdoing" and the likely missives sent to the SEC, any investigations as to the merits of the allegations would have been initiated/completed much sooner than the approximately six years since the pipe financing deal, in my very humble opinion.

Have you ever wondered why not one of those proponents has been willing to have their name cited in a derivative suit, even on a contingency basis?

.

.

.

Be well