You said:

But this litigation with TPL is most probably about his employment contract with TPL. Wouldn't you agree with that? Given what we know about TPL's finances at the end of 2009 going into 2010, TPL probably claimed or actually did not have the money to keep Nielson on board and gave notice to him. And if TPL didn't have the money, then what good is the employment contract? (I'm thinking similar to the Chet Brown case where he claimed that TPL cheated him on his employment contract). But why wait so long to file? That is what I was trying to speculate on.

You may be correct in thinking that Nielson's suit is about his employment contract.

What leads you to believe that Chet Brown's case had to do with an employment contract? Do you know something the rest of us don't? According to Moore's complaint (pg. 14) Chet Brown was an investor in TPL and his agreement, upon info and belief provided for payments to him based upon a $ of the gross of TPL revenues.

Leckrone is claiming the right to deduct his uncontrolled, unmonitored and previously undisclosed expenses from amounts otherwise due Chet Brown .....