total speculation. defendants using asynchronously, are describing the chip every one uses today. that said intel hp cummins even lego describe almost every technology today. of course arm is claiming they do not infringe. with over 20+ licensed manufacturers of that chip it is probably the most used. again most of our licenses probably use some sort of that chip. again why did these companies sign. just the simple logic asynchronously which allows chips to operate faster than ever before. a lot hangs on judge fogel but i found it interesting tpl emphasizing this word. can the judge ignore it? not guessing ask ronran it seems to show up as pretty important. the other side does not say their chips are operating synchronously which is complete opposite. the a makes all the difference in the world. again a waiting game. clocking etc all boil down to helmut paying for a chip that the whole world uses in some form in that family of ignite processors. my view they all infringe but arm is the big money. not a tech. so would be interested in views. have asked some technical friends describing above pretty confident difference asynch and synch and we have the patent totally my view