"Wow, that PR really gave the details, didn't it! No identities, no dollar amounts, no specific number of licensees, no total number of licensees. But if you want to characterize THAT as reporting, and ignore the advice YOU complained about from the AMS, then I guess that's just dandy!"

And I'll add that perhaps you haven't noticed, but since the Caterpillar license (no. 70) was announced over a year ago, there have been at least TEN more licensees. Of course, of those, we've only learned the names of FIVE of them.

Not sure what "standard of reporting" you're leaning on that's causing you to express your exasperation towards me about, but with PTSC, this is the "no identities, no dollar amounts, no specific number of licensees, no total number of licensees" (except for general "over 80" style numbers) are the NORM, not the EXCEPTION.