<If Barco is motioning to dismiss its claim with respect to the 584, is that an adversarial motion?????>

When the clerk said it was an adversarial motion, we assumed the clerk was referencing the content of the motion. Perhaps the clerk's understanding of adversarial is different from ours? Any motion that is not joint perhaps is considered adversarial? In which case the motion was probably to drop the 584 from their claims. It seems to make the most sense. Why would Barco want to keep the 584 in their claims? We already said we won't sue on the 584.

Opty