<I believe Mostek was a non-patent litature publication. In other words some kind of reference manual.>
I agree with the above but not sure how it applies to the question. It was at least part of the 4/5/07 OA rejection. It had to have been argued by our side. I do not see an argument in response to the 4/5/07 OA rejection.
Just want to be sure I am not overlooking it somewhere in all the merged reexams before I ask the PTO to post it.
TIA, Opty