You obviously missed my correction to your assertions:
Having the correct facts help when arguing a point:
On February 13, 2008, Asustek filed an amended complaint adding Asus International as an additional plaintiff, MCM as an additional defendant, and adding two additional patents-in suit.
The point that was made was that TPL should have never asserted the MMP with other patents against single infringers. The MMP should've never been brought under the Alliacense umbrella completely. It should've had its own llc, or something, so that any assertion was not to be combined with the TPL patents
Should this FUD continue to be posted, I will flag the post as an obvious violation.
Be well
