It really makes you wonder. If this news does have a negative impact, I will have no choice but to continuously harp on the dividend decision and hope that investors now understand how short sited it was. I was thinking earlier about the RG and Gloria purchases. I would bet my life that TPL had informed them of issues relating to the Quanta/LG case and how that would impact us one way or the other. The point is, why would they buy earlier knowing that the SC was going to rule within 60 to 90 days after their purchase? If the outcome went against patent holders and the impact was truly negative they knew the price would potentially tank. Conversely I'm of the opinion that a positive ruling would not have necessarily sent the S/P to the moon but it certainly would have lent more support. I guess what I'm getting at is the downside risk was much greater if they purchased shares and the decision went against LG. That being the case, are they really that stupid or does the case not quite have the impact on us that investors think? We really, really need mgmt to step up and explain this quickly. They've know for months what this ruling would mean. It's time to share that knowledge.