Re: IMO Schwartz stock sales - TS4
posted on
May 07, 2008 06:27AM
"Schwartz will probably be rewarded some where along the way."
Fully explain how that would work, as this is the big flaw in your reasoning, IMO. How does Swartz benefit? How does the management/BoD of PTSC benefit? What is their incentive to give up the gravy train overwhich they currently have some level of control?
Nobody has been able to explain these things with anything but ambiguity. I keep asking. No real answers. A huge flaw in the proposition, IMO. If such a thing were to come about, most of our BoD would be shown the door, IMO.
BTW, since when does Swartz have patent/IEE expertise/people?
And when is it that TPL is going public, and getting on the NAS?
And if TPL were to come out "way ahead on the deal", do they desire to face SEC scrutiny and inevitable law suits? The Lecky's have stared jail time in the face once that we know of, are they anxious to face that again?
IMO, your post in along the vein of certain other posts on another board. Blatant FUD, IMO.
While I'd bet TPL wants to own the entire MMP, I wanted Santa to bring me gifts last Xmas. Didn't happen.
Unless you can respond to the fundamental flaws in your proposition, I suggest you either fess up to the flaws, or just stop posting this non-sense.
And to answer your question "Are they working together to screw us, you tell me??" - IMO, no. Conspiracy to defraud is a serious felony.
JMHOs,
SGE
BTW, you might gain some credibity if you learned the names of the players.