It was apparent to me that mvaar was again trying to deceive, trying to suggest that IF we got $700M in revenues, we'd have a rightful value of less than $2/share (sense, per him, it appears the P/E multiple would be 1). What non-sense - IMO.

So I used his numbers, and used a little common sense. And yes, I did ignore tax liabilities (as did he). But I do believe, with $700M to throw around, you could easily find some very secure investments that would return a reliable 10%+ (e.g., interest income). And the absolute reliable return on investment (ROI) would certainly warrant a higher P/E than the electronics industry (relatively risky) average P/E multiple of near 40 (and remember that this is just the average, e.g., Google's current P/E is near 50 - is their ROI absoluely assured to increase over time?).

Just fighting FUD fire with fire! Actually, trying to throw any hard numbers around is an effort in futility. Same with assigning P/Es (e.g., what was EDIG's P/E multiple when it went to $24.50/share with a net loss - no revenues? I KNOW, trick question, because you can't multiply by zero).

FWIW,

SGE