optymystic
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 09, 2007 01:29PM
It's a different case, but the same the "case law". The J's claim is therefore without merit.
The court also denied the plaintiffs' motion to allow Higgins to testify, on the ground that any testimony adverse to Moore would violate Higgins's fiduciary duty to Moore, and because the court found that Moore had validly asserted the attorney-client privilege to prevent Higgins from testifying
Be well