Well meaning, but not realistic.

Brian was asked and appointed by Patriot.

Brian was undoubtedly asked to stay off the boards. IMO this does not mean Brian isn't doing his job - As a major common shareholder, he is well in tune with our needs and wants. I think he's as active as he can be, but I also believe he has to work within the definition of  duties, as spelled out between him, the BOD and Patriot.

IMO, asking for bi-weekly or weekly status from CEO's on developments should probably be reserved for Swartz or BOD level participants. Status to common shareholders is made available through the Shareholder meetings.

Candidly, I don't think the level of communication you're asking for can be afforded, given their manpower, priorities or our collective impact (share-wise).

You remember the "Golden Rule"?...not enough gold here, lol...

Regards