Re: The fools
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 21, 2012 04:13AM
Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section
OPC,
So you're thinking 5 or 6 more months of enrollment?I based my timeline on 2 more months.Oh man,I hope you're wrong.But it wouldn't surprise me.Nothing surprises me these days.This question from over a year ago always haunted me...
Kevin Tang - Tang Capital
So if I just take the outside of that, that's 18 months and I'm just wondering that the last 2 Phase III studies you ran, study 102 and 009 took 15 to 18 months just to enroll, not to complete the actual studies. So is it fair to say you're assuming that the enrollment period will be half of what it was in those studies?
Alfred Mann
Do you remember what they where?
Peter Richardson
I can't remember the exact enrollment time, but these are based on the assessments that have been done with our CRO and with some really careful diligence, in terms of how we can optimize the set up of this and these are the best estimates we have at the present time.
Hakan Edstrom
And if I remember it correctly, those studies also contained a much bigger patient number.
Kevin Tang - Tang Capital
I don't think they actually -- how many are you going to include in these studies?
Peter Richardson
150 completes per round.
Kevin Tang - Tang Capital
I think that's the same as the size of the prior 2, right?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/268906-mannkind-s-ceo-discusses-q1-2011-results-earnings-call-transcript?all=false&find=enrollment