whaler
I asked : "What explanation do you have for Cannacord liking the news but then not purchasing any UMJ shares either yesterday or today."
Your response : "Assuming you are correct, I have no explanation as to why Canaccord has not or did not buy any UMJ yesterday or today."
I find it amusing that you are only "assuming" I am correct. In fact, it's almost hilarious.
I made my post believing that Agoracom provides correct/credible information. If you think my stating what they have provided is assumption on my part, maybe you should take it up with them. Until you can convince me differently then I plan on continuing to use them as a reference source.
Never claimed to be a computer whiz but, here's a little tutorial for you and those of your friends who rely so heavily on your posts :
In the top right hand corner of this page where it states "Search Terms" type the symbol for Ursa Major Minerals. Make sure the search is to be conducted by Company Name or Symbol.
Hit the word SEARCH highlighted in green.
Now you are at the Ursa Hub at Agoracom.
Look to the left hand side of your monitor/screen. You have numerous options:
HUB HOME
PROFILE
STOCK QUOTES...................... Click on this one
Scroll down the page and and look at the Detailed Quote for Ursa Major Minerals. The top line in the chart offers numerous choices select Depth/L11.
It's quite easy to read and understand. Can you see details of price, size, time (or date) now look what is next to that. It gives details of the houses who bought or sold. If you have trouble remembering all those house numbers (and I'm sure you don't) just hover over them with your mouse and all will be revealed.
As of typing I can clearly see that House 33 or Canaccord didn't buy any UMJ today, yesterday or the day before. In fact I can clearly see purchases made dating back to 05/30/11.
This concludes this tutorial.
whaler, now that you've finished the tutorial perhaps you will realize why a majority of your posts are well, IMO, redundant.
BTW, now that you know I wasn't "assuming" anything (unless of course you still consider Agoracoms information to be less than credible) does that change your answer to my question?
TIA
