Okay help me out with my confusion. I am not sure what it was you said wrt "being correct" I do see a post where you ask me a question. I also do not see where the company has done something that needs correcting?.

Below is your post, of which much of it is my first post. BTW you should really use quotations and or italics to differentiate when quoting someone else.

If there is a point you are trying to make, be more direct and we can right to the matter. :)

************************************...

"From the filings (Pg. 8 of the Dec 29 AIF) just released, Note that in the filings some references to drilling are made for June 2007 and back as far as Dec 2006. So to use the term "end of summer" in the quote, keep this in mind.

With the current land position and boundaries, the mineralization identified in the North Zone could be accessed by open pit to a depth of 200m with deeper mineralization accessed via ramp."

"Whaler could you tell me what previously supported technical report supports this claim?"

************************************...

Now today you write:

"Whaler, If what I said was correct, and you and I are both not experts, why don't you show my previous post to the company. If I am correct, the corrective action is to pull the Annual Information Form and correct the line referring to the open pitt mine on page 8. When your Feasibility Report comes out (which I suspect should be very soon) then it can be re-entered. Why is life so complicated that people cannot show problems without hiding for their lives?"

Yesterday:

http://agoracom.com/ir/Inspiration/f...